North Dakota has the country’s only state bank. It is also
the state with the lowest unemployment rate and highest job growth rate. The
state is not near bankruptcy , there is no credit freeze stymieing job
creators, and no cut backs to social services, higher education, state
pensions, and the hiring of teachers, policemen, and firefighters.
What’s going on?
Well, in part, it’s
the state bank. By law, all state money that comes from taxes and fees is
deposited in the bank, which then issues low interest loans to students,
farmers, and businesses. The bank buys government bonds to spur development and
to shore-up infrastructure. With a state population of 600,000, last year it
made $60 million in profit. Of this, it returned almost one half ($30 million)
to the state for projects, disaster relief, and a rainy day savings account.
Why can’t
every state have a bank like this?
Instead,
banking in the remaining forty-nine states operates for profit. A state’s
government deposits taxes and fees in a big commercial bank that’s usually
headquartered in New York. These banks primary purpose is to generate profit
for shareholders. To this end, the banks make risky investments in hopes of
high returns. If a bet goes bad, the government (i.e. taxpayers) cover the
loss, while the banks keep all profit. The state gets nothing back.
Can someone
tell me why we put up with this?
No comments:
Post a Comment